President
and President Putin Discuss Strong U.S.-Russian Partnership
Constitution Hall
Bratislava Castle
Bratislava, Slovakia
5:50
P.M. (Local)
PRESIDENT
BUSH: Thank you all. I've just had a very important and
constructive dialogue with my friend. It's great to see -- I know
Laura was pleased to see Lyudmila Putin, as well. We have had, over
the past four years, very constructive relations, and that's the way
I'm going to keep it for the next four years, as well.
We've
had an open and candid exchange of views and positions. In
our meeting earlier I said, "Vladimir, when we get in here I think
people are going to be very interested in this press conference, for
some reason, I'm not sure why." Perhaps it's because you're a leader
of a great nation and I'm fortunate to be one, too. But you can see
we've drawn quite a crowd here. So I'm looking forward to answering
their questions.
We
produced a lot of positive results at this meeting. We agreed
to accelerate our work to protect nuclear weapons and material, both in
our two nations and around the world. And I want to thank you for
that. And I want to thank our Defense Ministers for working on the
issue, as well -- Minister Ivanov is here; he and Secretary Rumsfeld
have had a very constructive relationship. Our mil-to-mil exchanges
are very positive, and I appreciate that. You and I talked about that
a couple of years ago; I think they're coming to fruition, which is a
very important way to make sure we understand each other better.

We
agreed upon new efforts to fight the war on terror, to combat
MANPADS and improvised explosive devices. And I want to thank you for
that. Vladimir has been a -- ever since the -- September the 11th, he
has clearly understood the stakes that we face. And every time we
meet, he is -- we have an interesting and constructive strategy session
about how to continue to protect our peoples from attack. He is -- he
has confronted some serious attacks in his country. I know what that
means as a fellow leader. I know the strain, I know the agony, I know
the sadness, I know the emotion that comes with seeing innocent people
lose their lives, and we have shared that. I hope we never have to
share it again, that common -- that common situation.
We
agreed that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon. And I
appreciate Vladimir's understanding on that issue. We had a very
constructive dialogue about how to achieve that common goal. We agreed
that North Korea should not have a nuclear weapon. And again, this is
an area where we're working closely together as two nations of the five
nations that are involved with North Korea.
We
agreed to accelerate negotiations for Russia's entry into the
WTO. I stated that the other day in Brussels. We talked about ways to
move this process forward. We agreed to cooperate in the field of
energy. I told Vladimir that Secretary Bodman would be our main
representative on this issue, and I look forward to constructive --
hearing about constructive dialogue on energy.
We
agreed to work together to find peace in the Middle East.
Russia's a part of the Quartet, and they played a constructive role in
establishing the road map, and now we look forward to working together
to achieve peace.

This
meeting also gave me an opportunity to share my belief that
it's in my country's interest that Russia be a strong and viable
partner with the United States. It's very important that we establish
not only a working relationship, but that we understand that in the
21st century, strong countries are built by developing strong
democracies. And so we talked about democracy. Democracies always
reflect a country's customs and culture, and I know that. But
democracies have certain things in common: They have a rule of law and
protection of minorities, a free press and a viable political
opposition.
Russia
has made tremendous progress over the last 15 years. It's
an amazing transformation of the nation. And I applaud President Putin
for dealing with a country that is in transformation. And it's been
hard work. I was able to share my concerns about Russia's commitment
in fulfilling these universal principles. I did so in a constructive
and friendly way. I reaffirmed my belief that it is democracy and
freedom that bring true security and prosperity in every land.
We
may not always agree with each other, and we haven't over the
last four years -- that's for certain -- but we found a lot agreement,
a lot of common ground, and the world is better for it. Even though we
didn't agree on certain issues, if you really think about what we have
done the last four years, and what we want to do during the next four
years, the common ground is a lot more than those areas where we
disagree. And by working together, this world will be a safer, freer
and more prosperous place.

Mr.
President, it's great to see you again. Thank you.
PRESIDENT
PUTIN: (As translated.) First of all, I would like to
say that my meeting with the President of the United States has been a
friendly one, has taken place in a very trustful atmosphere. This has
been a dialogue of interested partners, which became clear right away.
In
the course of our meeting, starting from the first minutes of
our dialogue, we had a substantive discussion of the entire
international agenda. The President has mentioned the key items in our
dialogue. We share a position on the status of the Russia-U.S.
relationship. It is true that over the past few years, through joint
efforts, we have been able to accumulate a unique cooperation. We are
engaged in a constructive political dialogue, and we are discovering
new opportunities for joint business, cultural, and scientific
initiatives.
It is
obvious that Russia and the U.S. share long-term interests,
genuine strategic goals, and certainly, a great degree of
responsibility before our own people and people of other countries. We
talked about international security. This reality is not affected by
the circumstances of the moment or the consolidation of political
interests. Therefore, we can see no alternative to the consistent
strengthening of the Russia-U.S. relationship.
In
the course of this summit, we have agreed upon specific
guidelines that will navigate us through the process of cooperation in
the forthcoming three years. This has to do primarily with addressing
the threats and challenges of today; first and foremost, fighting
terrorism. We have agreed to better coordinate our efforts on these
fronts, including through the Russia-U.S. working group on
counterterrorism, which has existed five years. Among the highlighted
priorities have been the neutralization of the systems of financing and
recruiting of terrorists, and work on identifying terrorist cells, et
cetera.

We
are ready to jointly work on the pressing problem of stemming
the illicit trade in MANPADS. Our colleagues today agreed upon this in
very concrete terms. I'd like to note that on the sidelines of this
summit, the Russian Minister of Defense, Sergei Ivanov and Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice signed a Russian-U.S. arrangement on cooperation
in enhancing control over MANPADS. It is important to neutralize the
attempts to proliferate weapons of mass destruction.
We
talked a lot about nonproliferation. We talked a lot about the
situation in Iran, about the situation in Iran -- North Korea, and we
share a common opinion in this regard, and we are taking a similar
approach. We should put an end to the proliferation of missiles and
missile technology. The proliferation of such weapons is not in the
interest of specific countries, or the international community, in
general.
We
have also exchanged our views on the situation in Iraq, in the
Middle East. Russia and the U.S. have at their disposal some solid
opportunities for normalizing the situation in places where regional
crises take place. We intend to actually use this potential. We have
paid great attention to economic cooperation including, as has already
been said, the possible accession of Russia to the WTO. We have
reaffirmed our intention to continue our search for mutually acceptable
solutions of the outstanding problems. Russia is ready for a
reasonable compromise, but this compromise should not go beyond the
usual responsibilities assumed by countries acceding to the WTO.
In
the presence of the press, I would like to thank the President
of the United States for the serious message that our negotiators
noticed in the course of negotiations, a message aimed at resolving all
the problems that stand in the way of Russia's accession to the WTO.
I'm sure that not only Russian economy, but also the U.S. economy are
interested in the positive outcome.

We
also discussed the issues relating to Russia-U.S. energy
dialogue. We've had some progress in this area, some good progress.
We're going to continue this dialogue. Some issues have been
positively resolved in terms of expanding the operation of U.S.
companies in Russian energy markets. ConocoPhilips, as you know, has
bought a stake in Lukoil, one of the major Russian oil companies. It
bought a stake that used to belong to the Russia state. This happened
recently, and I'm confident that this will be a success story, both for
Russian and U.S. partners.
Another
important and interesting opportunity is our cooperation in
the supplies of liquified natural gas. In the year 2010, 2011, a large
amount of liquified natural gas can be supplied from Russia to the
United States. Our investment corporation is becoming generally
bilateral. The first steps -- but constant steps are being made by
Russian companies that are starting to invest their capital into
American economy.
We
have also discussed the status and prospects of Russia's
cooperation in science, high-tech; in particular, in the exploration of
outer space.
In
conclusion, I would like to say that I highly appreciate the
outcome of this summit. Later this year, we are going to meet a few
more times within the framework of various international fora. I would
like to take this opportunity to thank the President of the United
States who has accepted the invitation to participate in the
festivities on the occasion of the anniversary of the great victory on
May 9th in Moscow. This is a natural manifestation of respect of
historic memory and the memory of the alliance that bonded our two
countries in the years of the second world war.
Thank
you.

Q Mr.
President, four years ago when you first met with
President Putin, at a time some in the world were questioning his
commitment to democracy, you reassured a lot of those critics by saying
that you had looked into his soul and saw a man that you found
trustworthy. You've just listed some concerns here today. I'm
wondering if you could unequivocally and without reservation repeat
that statement today?
And,
Mr. Putin, I'd like to ask you to address critics in the
United States and elsewhere who saw Mr. Gorbachev and Mr. Yeltsin as
taking early steps on the path to democracy and worry that you have
reversed course.
PRESIDENT
BUSH: One thing I -- gave me comfort in making the
statement I made in Slovenia was that Vladimir said, when I agree with
you, I'll agree with -- I'll tell you, and when I disagree with you,
I'll tell you. In other words, we'll have a very frank and candid and
open relationship. And that's the way it's been. There was no doubt
in my mind what his position was on Iraq. He didn't kind of hedge, he
didn't try to cloud up the issue. He made it abundantly clear to me
that he didn't agree with my decision. And that's an important part of
having a trustworthy relationship, a relationship where, when a person
tells you something, you know he means what he says, and, "yes" means
yes, and "no" means no. Sometimes in politics yes means "maybe," and
no means "if." This is the kind of fellow who, when he says, yes, he
means, yes, and when he says, no, he means, no.
And
we had a discussion about some decisions he's made. He's had
some interest in the decisions I've made. And that's a very important
dialogue. And as I said, I'll say it again, I think it's very
important that all nations understand the great values inherent in
democracy -- rule of law and protection of minorities, viable political
debate. When I brought that -- I don't want to put words in --
Vladimir can speak for himself on this issue, but all I can tell you
is, he said -- yes meant yes, when we talked about values that we
share.

PRESIDENT
PUTIN: First of all, I would like to say that we
discussed these issues at length, face to face, just the two of us.
Russia has made its choice in favor of democracy. Fourteen years ago,
independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision
in the interests of itself and interests of its people -- of its
citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There
can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for
this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees
from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be
impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism
for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian
society.
As
far as the questions that are being discussed among our partners
in the media, I can only repeat what has been said by the President of
the United States. First, we are not going to make up -- to invent any
kind of special Russian democracy; we are going to remain committed to
the fundamental principles of democracy that have been established in
the world. But, of course, all the modern institutions of democracy --
the principles of democracy should be adequate to the current status of
the development of Russia, to our history and our traditions.
There
is nothing unusual here, either. In every country, these
overall principles are embodied in this or that way. In electoral law,
we can compare the United States and a number of European countries.
In the operation of major democratic institutions, there may be some
differences, but the main, fundamental principles are going to be
implemented in the form in which they have been developed by the
modern, civilized society.
As
far as the preceding period in our development, no doubt the
credit that can be given to that period in the development of the
Russian Federation for the fact that the previous generation of
politicians, despite all the difficulties that have arisen due to
changes in Russia, they have given the main thing to the Russian people
-- that is freedom. But I believe that a lot of people will agree with
me, the implementation of the principles and norms of democracy should
not be accompanied by the collapse of the state and the impoverishment
of the people.
We
believe, and I personally believe, that the implementation and
the strengthening of democracy on the Russian soil should not
jeopardize the concept of democracy. It should strengthen statehood
and it should improve living standards for the people. It is in this
direction that we're going to act.

Q
First of all, I wanted to ask another question, but we have an
interesting conversation now, therefore I'm going to ask about the
following: It seems to me that you have nothing to disagree about.
The regimes that are in place in Russia and the U.S. cannot be
considered fuller democratic, especially when compared to some other
countries of Europe, for example -- for example, The Netherlands. It
seems to me, that as far as Russia is concerned, everything is clear,
more or less. But as far as the U.S. is concerned, we could probably
talk at length. I am referring to the great powers that have been
assumed by the security services due to which the private lives of
citizens are now being monitored by the state. This could be explained
away by the consequences of September 11th, but this has nothing to do
with democratic values. How could you comment on this? I suggest that
you can probably agree -- you can probably shake hands and continue to
be friends in future.
PRESIDENT
BUSH: I live in a transparent country. I live in a
country where decisions made by government are wide open, and people
are able to call people to -- me to account, which many out here due on
a regular basis. Our laws, and the reasons why we have laws on the
books, are perfectly explained to people. Every decision we have made
is within the Constitution of the United States. We have a
Constitution that we uphold. And if there is a question as to whether
or not a law meets that Constitution, we have an independent court
system, through which that law is reviewed.
So
I'm perfectly comfortable in telling you, our country is one
that safeguards human rights and human dignity, and we resolve our
disputes in a peaceful way.
PRESIDENT
PUTIN: I would like to support my American counterpart.
I'm absolutely confident that democracy is not anarchy. It is not a
possibility to do anything you want. It is not the possibility for
anyone to rob your own people. Democracy is, among other things, and
first and foremost, the possibility to democratically make democratic
laws and the capability of the state to enforce those laws.
You
have cited a curious example -- The Netherlands. The
Netherlands is a monarchy, after all. I have no doubts about the
democratic nature of that country. That is certainly a democratic
nation, but this is very different from the United States and Russia.

There
are great differences between Russia and the U.S., as well.
If we talk about where we have more or where we have less democracy is
not the right thing to do. But if we talk about how the fundamental
principles of democracy are implemented in this or that historic soil,
in this or that country, is an option, it's possible. This does not
compromise the dignity of The Netherlands or Russia or the U.S.
Q --
on some of the decisions he has made on his democratic
institutions, or have you just agreed to disagree? And, President
Putin, did anything President Bush say to you today prompt you to
reconsider some of those decisions?
PRESIDENT
BUSH: I think the most important statement that you
heard, and I heard, was the President's statement, when he declared his
absolute support for democracy in Russia, and they're not turning
back. To me, that is the most important statement of my private
meeting, and it's the most important statement of this public press
conference. And I can tell you what it's like dealing with the man
over the last four years: When he tells you something, he means it.
He asked what some of my concerns were, and he explained answers. I
told him that it was very important that capital see rule of law, that
there be stability, there not be any doubt about whether or not -- if
somebody invests, whether or not the laws change. And I think Vladimir
heard me loud and clear, and he explained why he made decisions he
made.
But
we had very frank discussions about a variety of issues. And
the operative -- again, the operative statement, the summary statement
that I think is important for people to hear in our countries,
precisely his opening statement to King's question -- speaking about
monarchies. Anyway. Get it? (Laughter.) It's late in the trip.
Which is, firm belief in democracy. And I appreciate that.

PRESIDENT
PUTIN: I have already mentioned that we have paid a lot
of attention to these issues. I get the impression that sometimes the
public in the now partner countries do not have the full knowledge and,
consequently, do not have the full understanding of what is taking
place in the Russian Federation. Naturally, within our countries,
there are people who are in favor and there are those who are opposed
to the decisions that are being made -- for example, the decision on
the new procedure for the election of regional leaders in the Russian
Federation.
But
those who are opposed are richer than those who are in favor --
they have the opportunity to spread their opinion in the media, and we
often do not pay the attention to that. I'd like to draw your
attention to the fact that the leaders of the regions of the Russian
Federation will not be appointed by the President. Their canvases will
be presented, will be submitted to regional parliaments that are
elected through secret ballot by all the citizens. This is, in
essence, a system of the electoral college, which is used, on the
national level, in the United States, and it is not considered
undemocratic, is it?
We
discussed these issues at length and some of the ideas -- I
wouldn't say, advice -- but some of the ideas that I heard from my
partner I respect a lot. And I believe that some of his ideas could be
taken into account in my work, and I will pay due attention to them,
that's for sure. Some other ideas, I will not comment on. Thank you.
Q To
follow up on the issue of democratic institutions,
President Bush recently stated that the press in Russia is not free.
What is this lack of freedom all about? Your aides probably mentioned
to you that our media, both electronic and our printed media -- full
coverage of the manifestations and protests in our country. Our
regional and national media often criticize the government
institution. What about you? Why don't you talk a lot about
violations of the rights of journalists in the United States, about the
fact that some journalists have been fired? Or do you prefer to
discuss this in private with your American colleague?

PRESIDENT
BUSH: I don't know what journalists you're referring
to. Any of you all still have your jobs? No, I -- look, I think it's
important any viable democracy has got a free and active press.
Obviously, if you're a member of the Russian press, you feel like the
press is free. And that's -- feel that way? Well, that's good.
(Laughter.) But I -- I talked to Vladimir about that. And he -- he
wanted to know about our press. I said, nice bunch of folks. And he
wanted to know about, as you mentioned, the subject of somebody getting
fired. People do get fired in American press. They don't get fired by
government, however. They get fired by their editors or they get fired
by their producers, or they get fired by the owners of a particular
outlet or network.
But a
free press is important. And it is -- it is an important
part of any democracy. And if you're a member of the press corps and
you feel comfortable with the press in Russia, I think that is a pretty
interesting observation for those of us who don't live in Russia to
listen to.
But
no question, whether it be in America or anywhere else, the
sign of a healthy and vibrant society is one in where there's an active
press corps. Obviously, there has got to be constraints. There's got
to be truth. People have got to tell the truth, and if somebody
violates the truth, then those who own a particular newspaper or those
who are in charge of particular electronic station need to hold people
to account. The press -- the capacity of the press to hold people to
account also depends on their willingness to self-examine at times when
they're wrong. And that happens on occasion in America. And that's --
that's an important part of maintaining a proper relationship between
government and press.
I can
assure you that the folks here are constantly trying to hold
me to account for decisions I make and how I make decisions. I'm
comfortable with that. It's part of the checks and balances of a
democracy.
And
so I'm glad to hear you're editorial comment, so to speak, on
your comfort with the situation of the press corps in the Federation of
Russia.

PRESIDENT
PUTIN: First of all, what do you mean when you say, I
keep silent -- or we keep silent about this or that problem? First of
all, I'm not the minister of propaganda. Second, we discuss all issues
in absolute openness. As George said, today we discussed this issue,
as well, with regard to Russia and the United States. But what is
absolutely obvious is that in the United States, there are a lot of
mechanisms to uphold the freedom of the press. And as far as the fact
that there is some kind of friction between the media and the
government, there is an ongoing debate, an ongoing critical debate
going on. There is a lot of criticism coming from the media with
respect to the government. This is an manifestation of democracy.
What you mentioned about the comments in the media of the actions of
the Russian government is testimony to the fact that we do have freedom
of the press. Although we're being criticized often of that, this is
not the case.
When
we discuss these issues, absolutely frankly, we, and I, in
particular, do not think that this has to be pushed to the foreground,
that new problems should be created from nothing. And I do not think
that we should jeopardize the Russian-American relationship, because
we're interested in the development of this relationship. We are
paying close attention to all the comments of the press or opposing
forces, but our responsibility is to, in spite of all these problems of
which there are plenty, our responsibility is to positively develop the
Russian-American relationship.
I
would like to thank the President of the United States for his
constructive dialogue that we've had today. Thank you very much.
(Applause.)
END
6:24 P.M. (Local)
Photo Note 1:
President George W. Bush leans in to speak with Russia President
Vladimir Putin Thursday, Feb. 24, 2005 during a photo opportunity in
Bratislava, Slovakia. The meeting of the two leaders marked the last
during President Bush's five-day European trip. White House photo
by Eric Draper
Photo Note 2: President George W. Bush and Russian President
Vladimir Putin clasp hands after a joint news conference Thursday, Feb.
24, 2005, in Bratislava, Slovakia. Said President Bush, "I applaud
President Putin for dealing with a country that is in transformation,"
adding, "It's been hard work." White House photo by Paul Morse
