Thursday,
September
04, 2003
In Kansas City,
President
Bush Cites Rising Confidence in America's Economy
Kansas City
Convention
Center, Kansas City, Missouri
THE
PRESIDENT: Thank you
all. I appreciate the warm welcome. It's nice to be back here in Kansas
City. I feel comfortable here. After all, it's a place of good baseball
-- (applause) -- pretty good football -- (applause) -- and really good
barbecue. (Applause.)
I have come
to this important
city, right here in the heart of America, to speak about the future of
our nation's economy. I want to talk about jobs and job creation.
Kansas
City in many ways symbolizes the incredible energy and ingenuity and
flexibility
of our economy. It wasn't all that long ago that Kansas City was known
for rail lines and stockyards. Now, the economy is a more modern
economy
because of the spirit of enterprise that exists here, and because of
the
willingness for the people to work hard, because of the optimism of the
people in this part of the world. And I share your optimism about the
future
of this nation.
America's
economy today
is showing signs of promise. We're emerging from a period of national
challenge
and economic uncertainty. The hard work of our people and the good
policies
of our government are paying off. Our economy is starting to grow
again.
Americans are feeling more confident. I am determined to work with the
United States Congress to turn these hopeful signs into lasting growth
and greater prosperity and more jobs. (Applause.)
I want to
thank Terry
Dunn for his kind introduction. I like a good short introduction.
(Laughter.)
I appreciate Pete Levi, the President of the Greater Chamber. I flew
from
Washington here today with two fine Americans: Senator Jim Talent is
doing
a great job for the people of Missouri -- (applause) -- and Congressman
Sam Graves. (Applause.)
On the plane
ride down,
Sam told me that his mother was going to be here today. And I said, I
hope
you're still listening to your mother. (Laughter.) I'm still listening
to mine -- (laughter)-- most of the time. (Laughter.)
I want to
thank Paul Rodriquez
and CiCi Rojas from the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce for -- (applause).
I also want to thank the Board of Directors and the members of the
Chamber
for allowing me to come to discuss with you the future of this
country.

Before I do
so, though,
I had the honor of meeting Tom Holcom. He's a Missouri native who was
out
there at Air Force One when -- at the airport when we landed, to greet
me at Air Force One. He started Angel Flight Central. He is a -- it's a
non-profit organization that provides free air transportation to those
in need due to a crisis. The reason I bring this up is that I know the
great strength of America is the heart and soul of the American people.
And everywhere I go, I like to herald those quiet heroes who are making
a difference in people's lives by volunteering time. I like to tell
people
that it's important for this nation to usher in a period of personal
responsibility.
And part of that -- (applause) -- and part of a responsibility society
is to love a neighbor just like you'd like to be loved yourself.
(Applause.)
I want to
thank Tom for
using his time and talent to help somebody in need. I want to thank you
all, if you're a member of the army of compassion in this United States
of America, for serving your community by helping somebody who hurts,
by
reaching out a hand to a neighbor in need. Now, government can help. We
can pass out money. But government cannot put hope in people's hearts
or
sense of purpose in people's lives. That is done when a kind soul puts
their arm around a brother and sister in need and says, I love you,
what
can I do to help? (Applause.)
Events of
the last few
years have revealed the amazing resilience of our nation's economy. In
our country's history, recessions have typically resulted from single,
unexpected shocks, such as spikes in energy prices or sudden shifts in
markets. Since 2000, our economy has been dealt not just one shock, but
three -- a set of challenges with few parallels in American
history.
First, the
stock market
began a steady decline in March, 2000, as investors realized that the
economy
was not healthy. Businesses faced over-capacity during that period of
time
and cut their budgets for new investment in technology or equipment.
And
by early 2001, this economy was in recession. And secondly, we were
attacked
on a fateful day, September the 11th, 2001. An enemy which hates
America
attacked us and killed a lot of our citizens. It brought our nation
great
grief and shock, and it disrupted our economy. The stock market shut
down
for days; commercial airlines were devastated. Travel and the tourism
industry
has struggled since, and the costs of higher security are still being
paid.
The economic impact of those attacks is estimated at $80 billion in
economic
damage and lost output, which is nearly equivalent to wiping out the
entire
economy of Kansas for one year. The economic impact of September the
11th
continued because of the uncertainty from the war on terror -- from
operations
in Afghanistan or war on terror in Iraq, or relentless hunt for the
killers.
In times of
conflict,
decision-makers are hesitant to make major purchases, businesses are
hesitant
to hire new people. The march to war is not conducive for hopeful
investment.
Our military campaigns in the war on terror have cost our treasury and
our economy. Yet, they have prevented greater costs. (Applause.) We
will
protect this nation from further attack, and therefore, protecting our
economy from major disruption. The safety of our people, the security
of
the American people is of paramount concern to me. With a broad
coalition,
we are taking, and will continue to take, action around the globe. We
will
remain on the offensive against terrorist killers. We will stay on the
offensive. And this nation will prevail. (Applause.)

As we fought
this war,
our nation's economy was dealt a third major blow. We discovered
corporate
malfeasance in boardrooms across America. The scandals -- corporate
scandals
-- erased savings of Americans -- of some Americans; it forced the
layoffs
of thousands, and it undermined the confidence of investors. We took
action;
I signed tough new laws. In an era of personal responsibility, if
you're
a CEO in corporate America, we expect you to tell the truth to your
shareholders
and employees alike. (Applause.) And if you don't, there's going to be
serious consequence. (Applause.)
In each
case, this administration
did not stand by and hope that the problem would solve itself. We
acted,
with a strong belief in the spirit of the American people and in free
markets.
We acted to keep the entrepreneurial spirit alive and well. I based
decisions
on a fundamental principle -- when our economy is struggling, the best
thing that government can do to stimulate growth is to let people keep
more of their own money. (Applause.)
So I asked
for, and the
Congress passed, major reductions in federal taxes. We lowered taxes of
every American who pays taxes. (Applause.) We raised the child credit
to
$1,000 per child. We reduced the marriage penalty. It seemed like to me
the tax code ought to encourage marriage, not discourage marriage.
(Applause.)
These
actions have brought
substantial savings to the taxpayers, and have been critical in
fighting
the effects of recession. Under the tax relief we passed in 2001 and
2003,
a married couple with two children and a household income of $40,000
have
seen their federal income tax bill fall this year from $1,978 to $45.
(Applause.)
Thanks in
part to the
reductions we passed, real disposable personal income -- that which is
left in paychecks and other income after taxes are taken out -- has
increased
at 3.4 percent rate in the first two-and-a-half years of my
administration.
That's a faster increase than the pace set in the 1990s. People are
keeping
more of their own money. (Applause.)
That tax
relief is taking
pressure off of families and is adding momentum to economic
growth.
Tax relief came at the exact right time. (Applause.) I say that,
because
during
the first year of a typical recession, consumer spending rises only at
.3 percent. That's a typical recession. The most recent recession
-- thanks in part to the tax cuts -- consumer spending rose by nearly
ten
times that rate. When people have more money in their pocket, consumer
spending will stay strong. And that spending has continued.
Throughout
this recession,
consumers have shown a belief in America's future by buying homes. In
the
typical recession, housing investment falls by 10 percent and doesn't
recover
for nearly two years. Thanks to tax relief and low interest rates,
housing
investment dropped by only one percent in this recession, and then
began
to rise above pre-recession levels within only one year.
This July,
housing starts
reached their highest level since 1986. (Applause.) Homeownership in
America
is now at 68 percent, one of the highest levels ever recorded. And many
Americans have refinanced their homes, saving themselves billions of
dollars.
And that helps our economy grow, as well.

As Americans
grow more
confident and make more purchases, small and large businesses around
the
country are seeing the benefits. Purchasing managers have reported
rising
new orders for both goods and services in each month since May. Order
for
high-tech equipment have been declining -- had been declining since
2000;
they have risen steadily since April.
Investors
are showing
greater confidence in the stock market. Thanks to our efforts to reduce
taxes on stock dividends, dozens of major companies have announced
plans
to either increase their existing dividend payout, or pay dividends for
the first time, which will put billions of dollars in cash into the
pockets
of American shareholders. And that is good for our economy. (Applause.)
For small businesses -- and I know we've got some business owners here
today -- the outlook is improving.
I found it
interesting
that Americans are starting sole proprietorships at a faster rate than
they did in the 1990s. The tax relief we passed helps small businesses.
Most small businesses are either sole proprietorships or sub-chapter S
corporations, which means they pay tax at the individual income tax
level.
And therefore, when you reduce individual income taxes, you're
providing
much needed capital for small businesses all across America.
(Applause.)
Since small
businesses
create most of the new jobs in America, we recognized we needed to do
more.
And so, we gave further encouragement to small businesses by raising
the
annual expense deduction from $25,000 to $100,000. By helping small
businesses,
by creating the environment for capital accumulation and capital
investment
at the small business level, not only are we sustaining the
entrepreneurial
spirit in America, but we're helping Americans find work.
(Applause.)
The
recession was hard
on a lot of Americans. Over the past two-and-a-half years, I've met
with
dozens of our fellow citizens -- families who have struggled to meet
emergency
bills, seniors who saw their savings hurt by stock market declines,
small
business owners who had to put in a lot of work just to keep their
dream
alive. These Americans were helped by tax relief. Had we not taken
action,
this economy would have been in a deeper recession. It would have been
longer, and as many as 1.5 million Americans who went to work this
morning
would have been out of a job.
Instead,
because we did
act, the recession was one of the shallowest in modern economic
history.
Some critics, who opposed tax relief to start with are still opposing
it.
They argue we should return to the way things were in 2001. What
they're
really saying is they want to raise taxes. Higher taxes will not create
one job in America. Raising taxes would hurt economic growth. Tax
relief
is putting this nation on the path to prosperity, and I intend to keep
it on the path to prosperity. (Applause.)

I was told
of a story
of the Nebraska Furniture Mart. It's an interesting American story.
It's
a story of a family that started this company in Omaha, Nebraska, and
they
wanted to build a store right here in Kansas City, Kansas. It wasn't
the
best time to open up a store, but the people running the company
thought
it was a good risk, a good market. They planned on bringing -- or
hiring
550 new workers for their new store, because the tax relief we passed
put
more money in people's pockets, and the demand for the goods they sold
in that store was greater than they expected. So Furniture Mart hired
1,000
people instead of 550.
Robert Batt
and his family,
they run the company. He said this; he said, "We just believe in
America
and we do what we excel at, selling furniture. The customers are out
there.
We've never had a layoff in 67 years." Not only have they not had a
layoff
in 67 years, they had enough confidence and the policies of the
administration
were working such that they were able to provide work for 1,000 of our
fellow citizens. (Applause.)
Even as this
economy is
looking up, it's hard to feel confidence if you're somebody looking for
a job. People who have been hit hard in the manufacturing sector know
what
I'm talking about. Parts of this country are not doing as well as they
should -- regions like the Pacific Northwest and parts of the Midwest.
Part of the current problem is that job creation lags behind
improvements
in the overall economy. Of course, it takes awhile for job creation to
catch up. Usually when the economy comes out of a recession, jobs are
the
last thing to arrive. Employers tend to rely on overtime until they're
sure it makes sense to hire another worker.
Yet, there's
another basic
reason for lagging employment, and that is increases in worker
productivity.
Over the long-term, higher productivity lifts workers wages and
standards
of living, and it helps the economy. We've got the most productive
workers
in the world right here in America. And that's good for the long-term
economic
prospects. You see, higher levels of productivity means that we'll see
better-paying jobs for the American worker. But there is a down side in
the short-term. When a business can produce more per employee -- in
other
words, productivity has gone up per person -- it does not hire new
people
right away to meet rising demand.
So
therefore, the agenda
that I've got, and I'm going to describe to you, to build on what we
have
done already, has one thing in mind, and that is, our economy must grow
faster than productivity increases to make sure that people can find a
job. I'm interested in Americans going to work. That's what I'm
interested
in. (Applause.)

And we will
continue to
help individuals get through the tough times and to prepare for better
times. My administration supported the extensions of the unemployment
benefits
so that people that have been laid off get the help they need. Our
economy
demands new and different skills. We are a changing economy. And
therefore,
we must constantly educate workers to be able to fill the jobs of the
21st
century. And so, therefore, I went to Congress and asked for increased
funding for Pell Grants for higher education scholarships.
Now, more
than 1.9 million
community college students receive those grants. Community colleges are
great places for people to learn new skills so they can fill the new
jobs
of the 21st century. And that's why the Department of Labor has begun a
high-tech job training initiative to create partnerships between
employers
-- those people who know what kind of jobs are needed -- community
colleges
and career centers, so that those looking for work can match education
and the skills they learn with the jobs that actually exist.
And for
those who are
having the hardest time finding work, I proposed to the Congress a new
idea called reemployment accounts. These accounts will provide a job
seeker
with up to $3,000 to pay for training, day care, transportation,
relocation
expenses, whatever it takes to find a new job. And if they find a job
quicker
than the allotted time for the $3,000, they get to keep the difference
between what they've spent and the $3,000 as a reemployment bonus.
These
accounts, if Congress will act, it will help more than 1 million of our
fellow citizen receive the training necessary to become employable, to
be able to fill the new jobs of the 21st century.
What's
interesting is,
right now, is that as the economy is getting a little better, employers
are now beginning to decide whether to hire more workers. Hiring is a
big
decision, especially big for a small company. After all, when you take
on a new employee, you not only show confidence in the person, you've
got
to have confidence in your company's future. And there are six specific
actions we can take to help build that confidence, so that people can
find
a job.
First,
people are more
likely to find work if health care costs are reasonable and
predictable.
Adding an employee often requires more than paying a wage -- you know
that
-- it means providing benefits, such as health insurance. But company
costs
for health benefits have been rising nearly 10 percent a year since
2000.
These increases cut the capacity to create jobs, and we've got to deal
with them. We've got to take this issue straight on. We can help small
businesses by allowing them to join together to shop for health
insurance,
allowing them to pool their risks in what's called associated health
care
plans. (Applause.) It makes sense to give small businesses the same
bargaining
power that big companies enjoy, so they can reduce their health care
costs.
(Applause.) The House of Representatives has passed a good bill. It is
time for the Senate to act. I thank Senator Talent for his important
leadership.
(Applause.)

In order to
address another
cost of rising health care, we must fix the problem of frivolous
lawsuits
against our doctors and hospitals. (Applause.) Litigation or the fear
of
litigation is causing doctors to quit the practice of medicine.
Medicine
is becoming less accessible because of the frivolous lawsuits. And the
doctors that continue to practice who fear lawsuit will try to protect
themselves from the lawsuit by over-prescribing, by covering
themselves,
by practicing defensive medicine, which drives up the cost of health
care
for everybody. And it drives up the cost of health care to the federal
budget. Frivolous lawsuits increase the cost to the federal budget
because
of increases in Medicaid costs and Medicare costs and veterans' costs.
Therefore, medical liability reform is a national issue that requires a
national solution.
I proposed
to the United
States Congress a reasonable reform for medical liability. Any patient
that has been harmed should recover all economic damages. We should
have
a cap of $250,000 on non-economic damages. If harm is caused by serious
misconduct, we ought to have reasonable punitive damages. The House
passed
the bill; it is stuck in the Senate. It is time for the United States
Senate
to pass medical liability reform, for the sake of job creation in
America.
(Applause.)
Secondly, we
ought to
take action on a lawsuit culture that affects the workers in every
business,
not just the docs. Industry estimates show that litigation is a #200
billion
a year burden on the U.S. economy. Obviously when big money goes to
trial
lawyers, it doesn't go to workers. So I proposed, and the House has
approved,
and it's stuck in the Senate, an idea to help relieve the cost of
lawsuits.
And that is class action reform. We ought to make it easier to move
class
action and mass tort lawsuits into the federal courts, so that trial
lawyers
won't be able to shop around our country to find a favorable court.
(Applause.)
And as we
are reforming
class action, it also makes sense to make sure that when a verdict is
handed
down, that the money actually goes to the people who have been harmed.
(Applause.)
Thirdly, a
growing economy
depends on steady, affordable, reliable supplies of energy. And yet, as
we've seen recently, businesses have had to cope with constant
uncertainty
-- uncertainty because of shortages and energy price spikes or
blackouts.
It is hard to be able to plan for the future when you're worried about
energy supply. And this is especially true for manufacturing companies,
which use about a third of the nation's energy. And so we needed a
comprehensive
national energy plan, one that seeks to upgrade the electricity grid,
that
makes reliability standards by those who deliver electricity mandatory,
not voluntary. (Applause.) We need to promote new technologies and
alternative
sources of energy. Someday we may just be growing our energy right here
in the state of Missouri. (Applause.)

But in the
meantime, we've
got to find more sources of energy here at home in an environmentally
friendly
way. I've been calling for Congress to pass a comprehensive energy plan
for two years. For the sake of national security, for the sake of
economic
security, we need to be less reliant on foreign sources of energy.
(Applause.)
People are
more likely
to find work if the resources of businesses are not spent complying
with
endless and unreasonable government regulation from Washington, D.C.
(Applause.)
We will meet our duty to enforce laws, whether it be environmental
protection
laws or worker safety laws. But we want to simplify regulations in this
administration. And we're working hard to do so.
I'll just
give you one
example. We streamlined tax reporting requirements for small
businesses,
helping 2.6 million small businesses save what is estimated to be 61
million
hours of unproductive work. By streamlining regulations, by making
regulations
more simple, the small businesses that were affected by this change
have
now got more money to invest in their businesses, which means it's more
likely they will hire somebody. Easing the burden of excessive
regulation
on all businesses is important for job creation all across our
country.
Fifth,
people are more
likely to find work if we continue to expand trading opportunities for
our goods and services. My administration is opening up new markets
around
the world for products that carry the international mark of quality, a
label that says, made or produced in the United States of America.
(Applause.)
Yesterday I
signed legislation
creating free trade agreements with Singapore and Chile. These
agreements
will lower tariffs on American-made goods and make our goods more
competitive
abroad.
Let me give
you an example
of what I'm talking about. American-made heavy machinery, such as motor
grader, costs $11,200 more when sold in Chile because of extra tariffs.
If that machinery were made in Canada or the European Union, it would
carry
no tariff. Therefore, an American product, because of the tariffs that
existed, were priced out of the reach of the buyer in Chile. Because of
bill I signed, because of my desire to make sure the playing field is
level
around the world, manufacturers will be able to compete on a level
playing
field. And there's no doubt in my mind that when the playing field is
level,
American workers can compete with anybody in the world.
(Applause.)

Finally,
people are more
likely to find work if businesses and their workers can be certain that
the lower tax rates of the last years will stay in place. Today you
don't
have that confidence they'll stay in place, and there's a good reason
--
because under the laws that were passed, tax relief is set to
expire.
The death
tax -- which
is being phased out and will disappear in 2010, but comes back to life,
because of a quirk in Senate rules -- will be revived in 2011. That
doesn't
make any sense to say to the small business owner or the farmer or the
rancher, we're going to phase out the death tax -- which is a bad tax
to
begin with -- and then let it pop back to life. But that's
reality.
Or how about
this: The
capital gains tax reductions, a vital part of encouraging capital
formation,
will rise by a third in 2008. The incentives for small businesses will
vanish in 2006. At midnight on December 31, 2004, the $1,000
child
credit is set to fall back to $700 per child; the marriage penalty will
take a bigger bite. That's the way the Congress did it.
What
Congress needs to
do is to get this message: When we threw out the old taxes, Americans
didn't
expect to see them sneaking in through the back door. (Applause.) For
the
sake of growth -- for the sake of economic growth, for the sake of job
creation, the United States Congress must make these tax cuts
permanent.
(Applause.)
I know
there's talk about
the deficit. The deficit is caused when less revenues come into the
treasury
relative to expenditures. And when you have a recession, less revenues
come into the treasury. But also remember, that time we're at war. My
attitude
is, any time we put one of our soldiers in harm's way, we're going to
spend
whatever is necessary to make sure they have the best training, the
best
support, and the best possible equipment. (Applause.)
And the tax
relief, which
is stimulating economic growth, is a part of the deficit. It's about a
quarter of the deficit. But this economy, as it grows, will yield more
money to the treasury. And I've laid out a five-year plan to reduce the
deficit in half. That assumes I have a willing partner in the Congress.
Congress must hold the line on unnecessary spending. (Applause.)
I have
proposed a 4-percent
increase in discretionary spending for this year's budget. It's about
equal
to the increase of the average family budget. If it's good enough for
American
families, it ought to be good enough for the appetite of some of the
congressmen.
They need to stick with that agreement. They need to understand that in
order to cut the deficits in half, we must have spending discipline in
Washington, D.C., and I will insist upon spending discipline in
Washington,
D.C. (Applause.)
There's a
lot we can do
now that the Congress is back in town. And I look forward to working
with
both Republicans and Democrats to set the framework for continued
economic
prosperity and growth.
I mentioned
earlier, I'm
optimistic about our future in this country. If you've seen what I've
seen,
you'd be optimistic, too. I've seen the great spirit of the country. I
know the attitude of the American people. I know the determination and
will, the willingness to work hard, the willingness to place family
above
self, the willingness to serve something greater than yourself --
that's
the American spirit. And it is strong, and it is alive, and it is
great.
(Applause.)
I have
confidence in the
future of America. I have confidence in our economy, because I have
great
confidence in the creativity and the enterprise of the American people.
Thank you
for coming.
May God bless you, and may God continue to bless America.
